The TELEFUNKEN ELA M 251 was an amalgam of these two microphones as it was capable of switching between all three patterns (cardioid, omnidirectional, and bidirectional). They originally worked alongside Neumann, notably distributing the U47 in the USA, but when Neumann decided not to renew their contract in the 1950s, Telefunken began working with AKG. Marc The Bass Wizard shows how fat a direct bass can sound when using the VMS ONE’s DI input along with the FG-76 Vintage Tube preamp emulation. Is the Neumann m149 the best vocal studio microphone, in the world ? Whatever words are best, I am willing to use them. Voice the mic like a U67, C12, U47, or ElaM 251. We went to world-famous NRG Recording Studios to compare the VMS FG-251 and FG-47 to real vintage microphones on male and female vocals, acoustic guitar and drums. Klaus Heyne. Through the years, many A-list engineers and collectors haveresponded enthusiastically to these gems and have created a trend foracquisition, as well. You’ve only got a few more days to take your set. Extreme care was taken to ensure that the capsules were aligned for each source during the comparison. Elam 251 E We invested in a stereo set of 251"s and let me tell you there is no disappointment! For me, whilst they are both great, the 251's are usually a little brighter, or "sizzlier," if you will, whereas the 47's are generally slightly softer and "rounder" in the mid-lowmids. Slate Digital CEO Steven Slate got up on the microphones for a raspy rock tenor male vocal example, which is ideal for really showing how the upper midrange of each mic responds. Another difference was that the Ela-M 250/251 had the selector switch right on the body of the mic, just like the Neumann U 47. Vintage Neumann U47 Microphone – (1949-1965) Telefunken Elektroakustik ELA M 251 Microphone – (1959-1962) The history of these microphones is actually really interesting, and it all started in Germany in the early 1900’s. Steven compared the VMS’s FG-47 mic and FG-73 preamp emulations to two amazing microphones, the Telefunken U47 reissue, and the Flea Microphones 47, which each went to a BAE 1073. If one of the capsules was even a few centimeters closer to the sound hole of the acoustic, it would have deviated the low frequencies and made the comparison invalid. These mics are extremely musical and have not sounded close to bad on any source we throw at them. In early 2009 he sold a mint pair of “investment grade” 251s at auction. Continuing to exploit the talents of the Slate staff, COO Matt Dodge provided some beats so we can hear how the 47’s compare when used as a drum room mic. Plati, Some real heavy-hitters in this photo courtesy of, @learntosoundfly mentor Carter Lee highlights how, This error message is only visible to WordPress admins. Slate Digital was co-founded in 2008 by Steven Slate and Fabrice Gabriel, with a mission to create the greatest digital audio tools for professional producers, mixers, and engineers. The vintage microphones went through a real 1073 preamp (the same one that we used in the modeling process for our FG-73 preamp emulation), while the FG-73 was used in post for the VMS tracks. NEW VS. OLD. The 251’s naturally sound as though they are almost being slightly EQ’ed and compressed in a pleasing way. This mic got its own de-esing thing going. This is another of those endless arguments which (I thought at least) were laid to rest a long time here: Topic: Comparing an Ela M 251 and U47  (Read 5923 times). what is or opinion ? Explore our unbeatable selection. Log in as an administrator and view the Instagram Feed settings page for more details. See also the new C12-style replacement grille option. Zetajazz44 New member. If someone can give me a reason why I like the "flavor" of the U47, Elam 251, etc, better than other mics, then I am all for it. The switch housing at the base of the capsule assembly is where the similarity between the Neumann GmbH U47/48 and the ELA M 250 / 251 microphone series ends. NRG’s Elam 251 also sounded nearly identical to the VMS’s FG-251 with the intensity set around 125%. 05-14 ... the tone on the "Thriller" mic was very hyped. Error: API requests are being delayed for this account. Specifications The incredibly talented Natalie Major came out to sing the female vocal parts. What's the sonic difference between a brand-new Telefunken U47 microphone compared to a vintage original Neumann U47? Check out @rellykia of @conquerdivide perform P.S. EQ signature of the capsule. Jan 1, 2006 #4 It took us a while to get this one right because he had to be very still and the mics had to be very carefully placed. Pay careful attention to the similarities of the 251’s unique top end sheen, and the 47’s robust upper midrange and slightly dark top. Ok, why do I want a Peluso ELAM over a Neumann U87. competes with the classics U47,U67, Elam 251… The mic was released in 1959. For every great old 67 and 47, there are a dozen "rebuilt" ones. The transformer in the 251E is made by Haufe, maker of the original ElaM 251 transformer. The bottom line here is that Telefunken USA has done exactly what they have claimed to do: offering a modern re-creation of what a properly functioning vintage 251 should sound like. Telefunken ElaM 251: The 12-251 is a slightly modernized take on the 251 idea, with higher headroom and just a hint of even-order harmonics. Neumann U47 Big Kenny New member. Find a Dealer. The situation is similar to the differences between the ELA-M 251 "E" and standard versions. Slate Sales Manager Nicolas Aliberti offered his guitar playing talents for the acoustic comparison. Despite being very similar to the U67, the M367 and M269 cousins have a different tone due to the unique qualities of the Telefunken tube. It is a 14:1 design; the Telefunken Elektroakustik unit is custom-wound by Haufe to the specs of the original, although some experts disagree. Each kit includes an unbranded mic body, custom PCBs, premium components, best-in-class documentation, and the large-diaphragm capsule of your choice.